Image is all-important in politics, and image making especially so. Politicians are supposed to create their own images, yet very often exploit negative and derogatory imagery in order to get noticed. Hitler deliberately borrowed Charlie Chaplin’s moustache, Margaret Thatcher played up to the image of the 'Iron Lady' wearing 'Churchill's Trousers' and Donald Trump is quite prepared to take dangerous medication in order to promote the luxuriant growth of his own hair. It seems like you couldn't make this stuff up, but cartoonists grapple with this sort of thing each and every day.
Does visually ripping the piss out of politicians actually help them, or is it one of the very few effective ways of getting to the truth of what they are really about? This is one cartoonist's experience of a weird yet wonderful profession.
Steve Bell is an English political cartoonist, whose work appears in The Guardian and other publications. He is known for his left-wing views and caricatures